linerteen.blogg.se

Focus problems sigma 18 35 1.8
Focus problems sigma 18 35 1.8











focus problems sigma 18 35 1.8

This switch and the two positions can be clearly seen in the animation to the right.

FOCUS PROBLEMS SIGMA 18 35 1.8 MANUAL

The lens features a sole physical customizable feature on the lens itself - the "AF/MF" selector switch to alternate between auto and manual focus. In case you forgot or just skipped that page entirely (you know who you are.), the following animation proves that: In case you may find yourself looking in your DSLR's mirror box to see if the two pins are there, this is what you should be looking for (shown using a Pentax K-3):Īs mentioned during the construction and handling page, the lens features in-lens focusing so that no piece of the lens protrudes or retracts when moving between minimum focus distance and infinity. In case you might not understand why, it's simply because previous camera bodies were not equipped with the two gold pins that paired with the rectangular contacts shown below that Pentax uses for its own proprietary SDM and DC in-lens autofocus motors (and thus Sigma's HSM implementation): The rear lens mount of the Sigma 18-35 shows that it can only focus using the K10D bodies or newer. It is compatible with all Pentax DSLRs since 2006 and Sigma promises it to not only be fast and accurate but silent in operation. The Sigma 18-35 F1.8 "Art" incorporates Sigma's proprietary autofocus, the "Hyper Sonic Motor," or the HSM acronym that can be found in the official name of the lens. Incorporating Sigma's state-of-the-art HSM motor, does the 18-35 "Art" autofocus match the excellent optical qualities of the world's fastest (and so far only as of this review's publication) F1.8 constant aperture zoom lens? Sigma 18-35 "Art" Autofocus - Technical Now that we've scrutinized everything about the lens we could, both its construction and image quality, our last dedicated assessment is of how the lens acquires those images - its autofocus system. Sigma 70mm F/2.8 DG Macro EX - Is Lens Hood Essential?.Caption Contest Caption Contest ending Monday 10 July 2023.Project 52 PROJECT 52-11-43-THE WORLD OF THE PHOTOGRAPHER-The Competition.Weekly Challenge #619 - Tiny nature - Winners.Weekly Challenge Weekly Challenge #620 - Friendship/Friends/BFF.Project 52 PROJECT 52-11-44- THE WORLD OF THE PHOTOGRAPHER- Favoured genre.Monster Adapter LA-KE1 Pentax K to Sony E Lens Adapter.Pentax K-1 and K-1 II Firmware v2.30 Released.May 2023 "Windows" Photo Contest Winners.Announcing Our July, 2023 Photo Contest.Using vintage lenses with the Pentax KF.My first impression with this new lens is that that cannot possibly be true, when using this lens. viewfinder use) is actually more accurate more consistently than contrast detection (live view). In all my past experiments with focusing I’ve found that phase detection (i.e. So even fully adjusted, a good third or more of the shots have the ears in focus instead of the eyes. Relative to that, the random shot-to-shot focus variation is about four units. That -8 makes the difference, in a typical two metre portrait distance, between someone’s eyes being in focus and the back of their head (and 35mm f1.8 means that’s a big difference). It’s only because I discovered that there was a strong back-focus in general, while just playing with it, that I realised I’d have to do something about it. In fact, I didn’t actually intend to run this calibration to begin with it all. I do have a Nikon 50/1.8G but I’ve never tested it in the same way (because I’ve never really had any issues in practice). This could be the same problem that was seen in reviews of the Canon version of this lens, or for all I know it could just be normal variation for this kind of lens (i.e. I also discovered that there is substantial shot to shot variation in AF accuracy. It’s also annoying how huge the jump is from 0.5 metres to infinity, which is basically your entire practical working range, and it does feel like the necessary adjustments for true infinity are substantially different to those for two metres.

focus problems sigma 18 35 1.8

On the upside, the latter at least means that small calibration errors don’t really matter. Calibrating for infinity is particularly difficult, both because it’s difficult to find a suitable target that is that big, and because the depth of field is very high at great distances. It took a good two or three hours to arrive at these settings, using a variety of home-made focus targets. And some comments on the process.Īs you can see, on my particular D5200 it has an overall tendency to back-focus (negative adjustment values mean “the subject was closer than AF thought”). Just thought I’d share what my AF calibration settings are, at least initially, for the Sigma 18-35/1.8 on a Nikon D5200.













Focus problems sigma 18 35 1.8